tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3215698539084024884.post1900546239880628247..comments2023-11-12T09:54:41.339-08:00Comments on echo: From the Amazon Nation to Warrior Xiongnu KhanateUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3215698539084024884.post-4011336970878700282016-10-26T18:56:17.513-07:002016-10-26T18:56:17.513-07:00Saggag differs from Akkadian very little and these...Saggag differs from Akkadian very little and these two languages are related. Saggag was folk language while Akkadian was coine language, first of it's kind registered in writing and it still didn't went far of Saggag form of writting but they did turned cunei 90° into unrecognisable shapes. Saggag have long prehistoric iconographic writings which were later stylised, Akkadian doesn't have that.<br />Akkadian appeared as set of harsh laws.<br />kasandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03687559500016085984noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3215698539084024884.post-6292817466966833472016-04-11T17:47:05.535-07:002016-04-11T17:47:05.535-07:00Arabs or Semites are newly named "race",...Arabs or Semites are newly named "race", semitic exist only 300 years and it is common name for newly created mix of black and white people. Taking names or creating them is not going to change the fact that ancient Hebrews are not Israelites. All about them is a scam.<br />Modern Hebrew which is not the same as ancient Hebrew is created 1920. Anyway both ancient Hebrew and Arabic are created by Phoenicians.kasandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03687559500016085984noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3215698539084024884.post-43377982548768619202016-04-11T17:43:10.785-07:002016-04-11T17:43:10.785-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.kasandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03687559500016085984noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3215698539084024884.post-17926588051954961532016-04-06T08:59:08.974-07:002016-04-06T08:59:08.974-07:00Edit: Those ancient sumerian Sag-giga which I wrot...Edit: Those ancient sumerian Sag-giga which I wrote about previously could not have been semites because Sag-giga used to fight semitic-speaking tribes. So it seems sumerians and arabs/semites were two different people. -Arianna-https://www.blogger.com/profile/02677514602431463072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3215698539084024884.post-90439745373205795432016-03-26T18:42:45.446-07:002016-03-26T18:42:45.446-07:00Wow, Sanda, this is excellent, thank you for addre...Wow, Sanda, this is excellent, thank you for addressing this topic. It's so interesting and you have so much info.<br />So, those russians are not so far from the truth after all, the ones I mentioned earlier (the "old-traditioners"), they still talk about the wars with the "yellow ones". (They even say that the chinese name Yuan is really slavic Yan/Janush/Janek.)<br />I don't understand why the 'asians' would choose to settle amongst the whites on a foreign continent, after all it didn't turn well. But what about the semites/arabs? They were also there. You say that Asia was inhabited by the whites.., the Middle East is also part of Asia, altough populated by arabs mainly. Did they also appear from somewhere else? The earliest sumerian texts from that region call their people Sag-giga, the black-headed ones. But it could mean anything, from black-skinned people (africans), to black-haired arabs or even the dark dravidians, as some suggest. Even the scholars argue about it. Altough, the semitic languages and their connection to sumerian would suggest that they have been there for quite some time now. What do you think about this (the arabs of the middle east)?-Arianna-https://www.blogger.com/profile/02677514602431463072noreply@blogger.com