Thursday, 29 August 2013

Illyria, Troja mapping and language discord




Misterious vase detail with giant horse, serie of Gammadian swastika and women around
there is water pouring between each fem and swastikas.




above -This relief shows battle of men and women.
bellow - seated Queen with Griphon and probably guards.

Dardanian labyrinth, Dea Dardanica

Dardanian Labyrinth of Dea Dardanica 


Daorson, Bosnia, Illyria

Kleitia Lusand Haire
Illyria, Durres

Slace, Centurion, Narona ,Illyrians
this drawing is product of sexual imagination of a male.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballaios


It looks like those that cover things up are too busy covering up so they need extra fingers for some loose ends. Tracing of Troja have been very difficult for over 3000 years because one day it is up North on Baltic, then it goes to Uk and finnaly it settled in Turkey. But hey, you can't fidgit forever, truth have very painfull way of surfacing back up. In these 2 wiki links discord between countries and languges is absolutely ridiculous. I was looking for Mysia or Moesia which was settled across todays Bulgaria and Romania, Troad as Troja is today in Bosna, Lycia in Croatia and Thrace/Thrakia in Bulgaria and Romania instead of todays Turkey.I just had to post this stupidity and copy entire Wiki link cause they are champions in re-writting His-story or even maybe dis-Troy previous His-Story...!!!

Mysia
Ancient Region of Anatolia

Paleo-Balkan languages


from Wiki; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysia

Mysia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mysia
Ancient Region of Anatolia
LocationNorth-western Anatolia
Largest cityPergamon
Roman provinceAsia
Location of Mysia in Anatolia
Mysia (/ˈmɪʒə/ or /ˈmʒə/GreekΜυσίαLatinMysia) was a region in the northwest of ancient Asia Minor or Anatolia (part of modern Turkey). It was located on the south coast of theSea of Marmara. It was bounded by Bithynia on the east, Phrygia on the southeast, Lydia on the south, Aeolis on the southwest, Troad on the west and by the Propontis on the north. In ancient times it was inhabited by the MysiansPhrygiansAeolian Greeks, and other groups.

Geography[edit source | editbeta]

The precise limits of Mysia are difficult to assign. The Phrygian frontier was fluctuating, while in the northwest the Troad was only sometimes included in Mysia. The northern portion was known as Lesser Phrygia or Phrygia Minor (Ancient Greekμικρὰ Φρυγία), while the southern was called Major or Pergamene. Mysia was in later times also known as Phrygia Hellespontica(Ἑλλησποντιακὴ Φρυγία, "Hellespontine Phrygia") or Phrygia Epictetus (ἐπίκτητος Φρυγία, "acquired Phrygia"), so named by the Attalids when they annexed the region to the Kingdom of Pergamon.[1]

Land and elevation[edit source | editbeta]


Coin of Mysia, 4th century BCE.
The chief physical features of Mysia are the two mountainsMount Olympus at (7600 ft) in the north and Mount Temnus in the south, which for some distance separates Mysia from Lydia and is afterwards prolonged through Mysia to the neighbourhood of the Gulf of Adramyttium. The major rivers in the northern part of the province are the Macestus and its tributary the Rhyndacus, both of which rise in Phrygia and, after diverging widely through Mysia, unite their waters below the lake of Apolloniatis about 15 miles (24 km) from the Propontis. The Caïcus in the south rises in Temnus, and from thence flows westward to the Aegean Sea, passing within a few miles of Pergamon. In the northern portion of the province are two considerable lakes, Artynia or Apolloniatis (Abulliont Geul) and Aphnitis (Maniyas Geul), which discharge their waters into the Macestus from the east and west respectively.

Cities in Mysia[edit source | editbeta]

The most important cities were Pergamon in the valley of the Caïcus, and Cyzicus on the Propontis. The whole sea-coast was studded with Greek towns, several of which were places of considerable importance; thus the northern portion included PariumLampsacus and Abydos, and the southern Assos,Adramyttium. Further south, on the Eleatic Gulf, were ElaeaMyrina and Cyme.

History[edit source | editbeta]

A minor episode in the Trojan War cycle in Greek mythology has the Greek fleet land at Mysia, mistaking it for TroyAchilles wounds their king,Telephus, after he slays a Greek; Telephus later pleads with Achilles to heal the wound. This coastal region ruled by Telephus is alternatively named Teuthrania in Greek mythology, and was previously ruled by a King Teuthras. In the IliadHomer represents the Mysians as allies of Troy, with the Mysian forces led by Ennomus (a prophet) and Chromius, sons of Arsinous. Homeric Mysia appears to have been much smaller in extent than historical Mysia, and did not extend north to the Hellespont or the Propontis. Homer does not mention any cities or landmarks in Mysia, and it is not clear exactly where Homeric Mysia was situated, although it was probably located somewhere between the Troad (to the northwest of Mysia) and Lydia/Maeonia (to its south).
There are a number of Mysian inscriptions in a dialect of the Phrygian language, in a variant of the Phrygian alphabet. There are also a small number of references to a Lutescan language indigenous to Mysia in Aeolic Greek sources.[2]

Ancient bridges[edit source | editbeta]

The remains of several Roman bridges can still be found:

See also[edit source | editbeta]

References[edit source | editbeta]

  1. ^ StraboGeographia, XII.5.3
  2. ^ Titchener, J.B. (1926), Synopsis of Greek and Roman Civilization, Cambridge MA



from Wiki; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo_Balkan_languages

Paleo-Balkan languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Paleo Balkan languages)
Paleo-Balkan is a geolinguistic term referring to the Indo-European languages that were spoken in theBalkans in ancient times. Except for Greek and the language that developed into Albanian, they are all extinct,[1] due to HellenizationRomanizationSlavicization and Turkicization.

Classification[edit source | editbeta]

The following languages are reported to have been spoken on the Balkan Peninsula by Ancient Greek and Roman writers:
Although these languages are all members of the Indo-European language family, the relationships between them are unknown. Classification of the languages spoken in the region is severely hampered by the fact that they are all scantily attested. Furthermore, many of the individuals who have published studies on these languages have had strong patriotic or nationalistic interests, which compromises the scholarly value of their work.

Subgrouping hypotheses[edit source | editbeta]

Illyrian is a group of reputedly Indo-European languages whose relationship to other Indo-European languages as well as to the languages of the Paleo-Balkan group, many of which might be off-shoots of Illyrian, is poorly understood due to the paucity of data and is still being examined. The Illyrian languages are often considered to be Centum dialects.[2] Today, the main source of authoritative information about the Illyrian language consists of a handful of Illyrian words cited in classical sources, and numerous examples of Illyrian anthroponymsethnonymstoponyms andhydronyms.
A grouping of Illyrian with Messapian has been proposed for about a century, but remains an unproven hypothesis. The theory is based on classical sources, archaeology, as well as onomastic considerations. Messapian material culture bears a number of similarities to Illyrian material culture. Some Messapian anthroponyms have close Illyrian equivalents.
A grouping of Illyrian with Venetic and Liburnian, once spoken in northeastern Italy and Liburnia respectively, is also proposed. The consensus now is that Illyrian was quite distinct from Venetic and Liburnian,[3][4] however a close linguistic relation has not been ruled out and is still being investigated.
Another hypothesis would group Illyrian with Dacian and Thracian into a Thraco-Illyrian branch,[5] whereas a competing hypothesis would exclude Illyrian from a Daco-Thracian grouping in favor of Mysian.[6] The classification of Thracian itself is a matter of contention and uncertainty.
The place of Paeonian remains unclear.[7] Not much has been determined in the study of Paeonian, and some linguists do not recognize a Paeonian area separate from Illyrian or Thracian. The classification of Ancient Macedonian and its relationship to Greek are also under investigation, with solid sources pointing that Ancient Macedonian is in fact a variation of Doric Greek, but also the possibility of being only related through the local sprachbund.[8][9][10][11][12]
Phrygian, on the other hand, is considered to have been most likely closely related to Greek.[13][14]

Albanian[edit source | editbeta]

The Albanian language is considered by current linguistic consensus to have developed from one of the non-Greek, ancient Indo-European languages of the region, but attempts to connect it to a specific language have been fruitless (see Origin of the Albanians).[15]

References[edit source | editbeta]

  1. ^ Simmons, Austin; Jonathan Slocum. "Indo-European Languages: Balkan Group: Albanian". Linguistics Research Center of the University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
  2. ^ A Grammar of Modern Indo-European by Carlos Quiles,ISBN 8461176391,2007, page 77,"The Illyrian languages are generally but not unanimously reckoned as centum dialects"
  3. ^ Wilkes, J. J. The Illyrians, 1992,ISBN 0631198075,page 183,"... We may begin with the Venetic peoples, Veneti, Carni, Histri and Liburni, whose language set them apart from the rest of the Illyrians. ..."
  4. ^ Wilkes, J. J. The Illyrians, 1992,ISBN 0631198075,page 81,"... " In Roman Pannonia the Latobici and Varciani who dwelt east of the Venetic Catari in the upper Sava valley were Celtic but the Colapiani of the Colapis (Kulpa) valley were Illyrians ( ... )"
  5. ^ Cf. Paglia, Sorin (2002),"Pre-Slavic and Pre-Romance Place-Names in Southeast Europe." 'Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Thracology', Sofia, Bulgarian Institute of Thracology – Europa Antiqua Foundation - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, I, 219–229, who states: "According to the available data, we may surmise that Thracian and Illyrian were mutually understandable, e.g. like Czech and Slovak, in one extreme, or like Spanish and Portuguese, at the other."
  6. ^ Vladimir Georgiev (1960), Raporturile dintre limbile dacă, tracă şi frigiană, "Studii Clasice" Journal, II, 1960, 39-58.
  7. ^ Paeonia
  8. ^ Paliga (2002) states: "It is therefore difficult to say whether the ancient Macedonians spoke an idiom closer to Thracian, Illyrian, Greek or a specific idiom."
  9. ^ Masson, Olivier (2003) [1996]. "[Ancient] Macedonian language". In Hornblower, S. and Spawforth A. (eds.). The Oxford Classical Dictionary (revised 3rd ed. ed.). USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 905–906. ISBN 0-19-860641-9.
  10. ^ Hammond, N.G.L (1993) [1989]. The Macedonian State. Origins, Institutions and History (reprint ed. ed.). USA: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-814927-1.
  11. ^ Michael Meier-Brügger, Indo-European linguistics, Walter de Gruyter, 2003, p.28,on Google books
  12. ^ Roisman, Worthington, 2010, "A Companion to Ancient Macedonia", Chapter 5: Johannes Engels, "Macedonians and Greeks", p. 95:"This (i.e. Pella curse tablet) has been judged to be the most important ancient testimony to substantiate that Macedonian was a north-western Greek and mainly a Doric dialect".
  13. ^ Brixhe, Cl. "Le Phrygien". In Fr. Bader (ed.), Langues indo-européennes, pp. 165-178, Paris: CNRS Editions.
  14. ^ Woodard, Roger D. The Ancient Languages of Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 0-521-68496-X, p. 72. "Unquestionably, however, Phrygian is most closely linked with Greek."
  15. ^ Alföldy, Geza (1964). "Die Namengebung der Urbevölkerung in der römischen Provinz Dalmatia." (Heidelberge) Beiträge zur Namenforschung 15.55-104; Duridanov, Ivan (1976). Ezikyt na trakite. Sofia: Nauka i izkustvo; Hamp, Eric P. (1957). "Albanian and Messapic." Studies Presented to Joshua Whatmough 73-89. La Haye: Mouton; Hamp, Eric P. (1966). "The position of Albanian." In: Birnbaum, Henrik & Jaan Puhvel (1966). Ancient Indo-European dialects: proceedings. Berkeley: University of California Press; Katičić, Radoslav (1964). "Namengebiete im römischen Dalmatian." Die Sprache 10.23-33; Katičić, Radoslav (1976).Ancient Languages of the Balkans. La Haye: Mouton, 2 vol; Krahe, Hans (1925). Die alten balkanillyrischen geographischen Namen. Heidelberg; Winter; Hans Krahe|Krahe, Hans (1929) Lexikon altillyrischen Personennamen. Heidelberg: Winter; Krahe, Hans (1955). Die Sprache der Illyrier, vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Winter; Kronasser, Heinz (1962). "Zum Stand der Illyristik." Linguistique Balkanique, 4:5-23; Kronasser, Heinz (1965). "Illyrer und Illyricum." Die Sprache 11.155-183; Neroznak, Vladimir Petrovich (1978). Paleobalkanskie jazyki. Moskva: Nauka; Paliga, Sorin (2002). "Pre-Slavic and Pre-Romance Place-Names in Southeast Europe." Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Thracology. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 219–229; version intégrale: Orpheus11–12.85–132; Pollo, Stefan & Alex Buda (1969). Historia e popullit shqiptar. Prishtina, 2 vols.; Pollo, Stefan & Arben Puto (1974). Histoire de l’Albanie: des origines à nos jours. Lyon: Horvath; Polomé, Edgar C. (1982). "Balkan Languages: Illyrian, Thracian and Daco-Moesian." In: Boardman, Edwards et al. (1982). The Prehistory of the Balkans; and the Middle East and the Aegean world, tenth to eighth centuries B.C. London: Cambridge University Press, The Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd ed., vol. 3, part 1, pp. 866-888; Schwandner-Sievers, Stéphanie et al. (2002). Albanian identities: Myth and history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Chapitres notamment par Noel Malcolm, George Schöpflin et Ger Duijzings; Simone, Carlo de (1964). Die messapischen Inschriften und ihre Chronologie. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz ('Die Sprache der Illyrier, vol. II); Rădulescu, Mircea-Mihai (1984). "Illyrian, Thracian, Daco-Mysian, the substratum of Romanian and Albanian." Journal of Indo-European Studies 12.77-131; Rădulescu, Mircea-Mihai (1987). "The Indo-European position of Illyrian, Daco-Mysian and Thracian: A historica-methodological approach." Journal of Indo-European Studies 15.239-271; Rădulescu, Mircea-Mihai (1994). "The Indo-European position of Messapic."Journal of Indo-European Studies 22.329-344; Untermann, Jürgen (1964). Die messapischen Personennamen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz (Die Sprache der Illyrier, vol. II); Untermann, Jürgen (2001). Die vorrömischen Sprachen der iberischen Halbinsel: Wege und Aporien bei ihrer Entzifferung. Wiesbaden: Westdt. Verlag; Watkins, Calvert (1998). "The Indo-European linguistic family: genetic and typological perspectives". In: Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Paolo Ramat, eds (1998). The Indo-European languages. London: Routledge; Wilkes, John (1992). The Peoples of Europe: The Illyrians. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Bibliography[edit source | editbeta]

  • Crossland, R.A.; Boardman, John (1982). "Linguistic problems of the Balkan area in the late prehistoric and early Classical period" in The Cambridge Ancient History Volume 3, Part 1. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-22496-3.
  • Polomé, Edgar Charles (1982). "Balkan Languages (Illyrian, Thracian and Daco-Moesian)". Cambridge Ancient History. III.1. pp. 866–888.

See also[edit source | editbeta]





Saturday, 24 August 2013

Anno Domini use to be Anno Diocletianus up to the 9th century!

Diocletian began his reign 20 November 284 during the Alexandrian year that began on 1 Thoth, the Egyptian New Year, or 29 August 284, so that date was used as the epoch: year one of the Diocletian era began on that date. This era was used to number the year in Easter tables produced by the Church of Alexandria.
The Anno Domini dating system was devised in 525 by Dionysius Exiguus to enumerate the years in his Easter table. His system was to replace the Dicletian era that had been used in an old Easter table because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.[9] The last year of the old table, Diocletian 247, was immediately followed by the first year of his table, AD 532. When he devised his table, Julian calendar years were identified by naming the consuls who held office that year—he himself stated that the "present year" was "the consulship of Probus Junior", which was 525 years "since the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ".[10] Thus Dionysius implied that Jesus' Incarnation occurred 525 years earlier, without stating the specific year during which his birth or conception occurred.
However, nowhere in his exposition of his table does Dionysius relate his epoch to any other dating system, whether consulate, Olympiad, year of the world, or regnal year of Augustus; much less does he explain or justify the underlying date.[11]:778
Blackburn & Holford-Strevens briefly present arguments for 2 BC, 1 BC, or AD 1 as the year Dionysius intended for the Nativity or Incarnation. Among the sources of confusion are:[11]:778–9
  • In modern times Incarnation is synonymous with the conception, but some ancient writers, such as Bede, considered Incarnation to be synonymous with the Nativity
  • The civil, or consular year began on 1 January but the Diocletian year began on 29 August
  • There were inaccuracies in the list of consuls
  • There were confused summations of emperors' regnal years
It has also been speculated by Georges Declercq[12] that Dionysius' desire to replace Diocletian years with a calendar based on the incarnation of Christ was to prevent people from believing the imminent end of the world

TIME IS COUNTED BY DIOKLETIAN UP TO 9TH CENTURY IN ENTIRE ROMAN EMPIRE WHILE EMPEROR SELF WAS ILLYRIAN ACORDING TO HIS-STORY-ANUS?
WHEN DID CHRISTIANITY REALLY STARTED?
WAS IT REALLY ROMAN EMPIRE?
SURELY NOT AROUND 0AD!

Many ,many "Roman" Emperors are Illyrian yet you never learned about it in schools!
These facts are for those that can see because it is not enough to just look.
Stroy about Christianity is a blatant lie because biggest oponent of Religion for Gentiles was Emperor Diocletianus DIOS-CLES meaning god's keys.


The thing with this Emperor was that he hated christians so much that he boiled them in hot oil.
WHAT IS DIOKLETIAN DOING IN BIBLE CONSIDERING HE RULED AROUND 300AD?
Why?
He knew that new religion is a religion created for "Gentiles"

in progress...







"Church of Gentiles"
and
"code of silence"


Who created Christianity?

Emperor Diocletian was banned by Rome with "code of silence" because of his famous aversion to Christianity but here is his even less mentioned wife that was helping someone to establish "Church of Gentiles"!
emperor Diocletian
up to 9th century time was counted as Diocletian era later scraped from history and renamed as Anno Domini 
full name; Prisca Serena 
and here extract from bible;


Vele martelaren werden tijdens de christenvervolgingen onder keizer Diocletianus in de stad ter dood gebracht, o.a. de heilige Athanasia met haar drie dochters en de heiligen Cyrus en Johannes. Er was een klooster, Metanoia genaamd, dat gesticht was door monniken uit Tabennisi, waar vele patriarchen uit Alexandrië hun toevlucht zochten tijdens de religieuze onlusten in de vijfde eeuw. Drie km. ten oosten van Canopus was in Manouthin een beroemde door farao’s gestichte tempel die later door monniken werd verwoest. Op deze plaats was ook een kerk gewijd aan de evangelistenCyrillus van Alexandrië bracht de relikwieën van de martelaren Cyrus en Johannes plechtig over naar deze kerk, die een belangrijke pelgrimskerk werd. De Arabische naam Abukir, ‘Vader Cyrus’, is afgeleid van de naam van de eerste van de twee martelaren.
~~~~~~~~~~
Egypt had many martyrs in the persecution of Diocletian, among others St. Athanasia with her three daughters, and St. Cyrus and John. There was here a monastery called Metanoia, founded by monks from Tabennisi, where many a patriarch of Alexandria took shelter during the religious quarrels of the 5th century. Two miles east of Canopus was the famous Pharaonic temple of Manouthin, afterwards destroyed by monks, and a church on the same spot dedicated to the Four Evangelists. St. Cyril of Alexandria solemnly transported the relics of the holy martyrs Cyrus and John into the church, which became an important place of pilgrimage. It was here that St. Sophronius of Jerusalem was healed of an ophthalmy that had been declared incurable by the physicians (610-619), whereupon he wrote the panegyric of the two saints with a compilation of seventy miracles worked in their sanctuary (MignePatrologia Graeca, LXXXVII, 3379-676)
Canopus formed, with Menelaus and Schedia, a suffragan see subject to Alexandria in the Roman province of Aegyptus Prima; it is usually calledSchedia in the Notitiae episcopatuum. Two titulars are mentioned by Lequien (II, 415), one in 325, the other in 362.
BIBLE TIMELINE
A lot of people don't know how we got the Bible at all. We westerners got the Bible thanks to the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church and members of the Church wrote the books of the New Testament. And they took over the books of the Old Testament which even by the time of Christ had not been finally decided upon by the Jews. The Jews did not close the Canon of the Old Testament until the year 100 AD or thereabouts at the Sinod of Jamnia, and there they decided which were the canonical books of the Hebrew scriptures and embodied them in the masoretic text. The earliest of which dates to early in the 10th century AD. The books that were to be included in the New testament were not finally decided upon until the year 382 AD at the Sinod of Rome under Pope Damasus. So it was the Catholic Church that promulgated the Bible. And said 'we are giving you these scriptures on our authority and by the authority of the informal tradition that has existed among us from the beginning inspired by the Holy Spirit'. So you receive historically the bible on the Churches say so. And the Catholic Church insists therefore that the church collectively, speaking presumably under the guidance of the holy spirit, has the authority to interpret the bible. And you can take that or leave it, because obviously the authority of the bible is not first of all based on the bible itself.

around 382 AD it was in draft, idea of rule over goyim and heavily battled by Diocletian and mothers sons that left their tracks at Ephesus. Matriarchy fell after 10th century! All paintings show different pic then what we know today.

It just couldn't be coincidence no more but a time line counted by Diocletian up to 9th century is telling it all.