Sunday, 31 January 2016

BIG FAT GREEK LIE





Greek interpretation of ancient statues


real ancient statues



Greeks today are of African origin which is obviously in contrast with looks of ancient Macedonians as this is how they were realy called, Macedonians. Greeks are prevalently haploup group E which is African.

























Alexander Macedonian was going under several terms which I'm going to clarify one by one;

Barbarian or Varvarian 
this term have been used in two ways, as member of Varvarian tribe and later as foreign language.
Considering that ancient Macedoninas of higher caste invented their own "lingua franca"
to distinuish themselves above commoners.

Illyrian (language)
Alexander Mac. was of Illyrian mother for sure.
It is doubtfull that Phillip was his father, not just because of their obvious hatery towards eachother but also because of numerous insinuations that his mother conceived him on her own.
(with snake or by god is all the same in practice, Phillip wasn't his father)

Scytian as recorded in other ancient cultures.
Macedonia was called Saku Dara by Haxamanishya (Persian or Archamenid) records from 500BC.
Saka in foreign tongue or Scytian in Sclavic tongue means "to wander" or SKITI,
infinitive form today is skitati

Scythia (/ˈsɪθiə/; Ancient Greek: Σκυθική, Skythikē)

The most detailed western description is by Herodotus, though it is uncertain he ever went to Scythia. He says the Scythians' own name for themselves was "Scoloti"

on the list bellow there are 3 Saccae or Scytian areas amongst which is Macedonia, called SakuDara -- in slavic it means Scytian Gift.



But never Greek.
In fact Greece does not exist in ancient records what so ever!

Macedonia does, Greece doesn't.


Greece as Masonic creation
wasn't realised
before 1911-1913





Greece is English Colony Company since 1822 ,
Britain liberated Greece from Ottomans in 1828 ,
almost hundred years later in 1978
it becomes Greek national flag.






Oxford edition map
year 1700
by Edward WELLS (1667-1727)

here is the same map , just enlarged, still no Greece








 


J. W. Gladstone, january 19 1897 British Statesman

opinion on Makedonia and Greece


In this times Greece was already made and name of Alexander 

from Macedonian is being shifted into "the Great"




Conditioning of acceptance was done in stages.



MAKING OF GREECE



1900 – 1949 … Hundreds of thousands of Macedonians were pursued, tortured and killed by the Greeks who occupied the Aegean part of Macedonia…
_________________

In early 20th century, the Greek soldiers were savages. We ought to re-post this text because previously it was banned because of the illustration, because of the biggest picture here, where the Greek soldiers pose standing above Macedonians they killed and decapitated. So, the post was removed. Someone’s found a way to report and ban it, and the part of the picture that shows the Macedonians killed by the Greeks, was cut.

But, the Greeks can’t ban the truth.
_________________

In 1912, the Greek army entered Macedonia for the first time ever in history. Horrific ETHNIC CLEANSING and GENOCIDE against the Macedonians ensued. The cruelty displayed by the Greek soldiers and the Greek state in their dealings with the Macedonian people was unprecedented; they themselves wrote to relatives and friends they have committed crimes that have not been seen since the times of Jesus Christ. More than 135,000 Macedonians were expelled from their land, the Aegean Macedonia. 200 villages were completely destroyed.

In 1913, the Greek army burned down the Macedonian town of Kukush -- 1,846 houses, 612 shops, 6 factories. At the same time, the Greeks burned down 4,000 houses where burned to in the vicinity of Ser.

After the partition of Macedonia in 1913, the Greek government continued with the policy of denying the nationality of Macedonians and began assimilating them more actively. Despite, about 350,000 Muslims were EXPELLED from the Aegean part of Macedonia, but 40,000 of them were Macedonian Muslims. Then the Greek state resettled 618,000 persons of NON-Greek origin from Turkey in the Aegean part of Macedonia.

The term "Macedonian" were PROHIBITED and the Macedonians were referred to as “Bulgarians,” “Slavophon Greeks” or simply ''endopes'' (natives). At the same time ALL Macedonians were FORCED to change their names and surnames, for the latter to end with the suffixes: -IS, -OS or -POULOS.

The Macedonian language was also banned. The written and spoken use of Macedonian was strictly prohibited and Macedonian literacy was being eliminated from the churches, monuments and TOMBSTONES... ALL the churches were given Greek names.

In 1926, the Greek government changed the TOPONYMS of the Aegean part of Macedonia: ALL villages, towns, rivers and mountains were RENAMED and given Greek names. The Greek state establised a policy of state terror against Macedonians who exhibited Macedonian national consciousness.

In 1936, Greek general Metaxas banned the use of Macedonian not only in everyday life in the villages in the markets in ordinary and natural human COMMUNICATIONS and funerals, but also within the FAMILY. Adult Macedonians were FORCED to attend what were know as evening schools ant to learn ''the Greek melodious''. VIOLATION of this rule led to being DEPORTED to desolated Greek islands.

The Protection of Northern Greece organization PAD and other such MILITARY FORMATIONS provided the deportation, through terror: 3,482 houses were burned down, 80 villages consisting of 1,605 families were plundered and 1,045 head of large live STOCK and 23,382 heads of small live stock were confiscated.

In the Kostur region alone, 4,500 Macedonian men and women were accused of autonomist activities, even though most of them were on active service with ELLAS. According to the information available, in the period from 1945 to the end of 1974 - 9,924 Macedonians were remanded in custody and 4,203 were convicted. 23,811 Macedonian men and women were interned on the basis of decisions of the special Security Commission.

The most typical examples of forced migration of Macedonians are to be found in eastern Macedonia, where Greek terrorist bands killed 29, imprisoned 3,100 Macedonians and expelled 600 Macedonian families across the borders - and this in the period from February to the end of March 1945 alone.



Greek massacres over Macedonians, 1905
It was very well known some times ago that newly-created Greece is not going to sit well with Macedonians. Newspaper clips from those that keep lying to this day.







17 comments:

  1. Greek Barbaros, from sanskrit:
    Barbara (balbala) - "stammering" but also non-Aryan, a foreigner. It didn't refer to a specific nation per se, it only meant that Alexander was a foreigner (to those who were describing him).
    There is also another explanation for the name Greek. It could mean Zrek / Żrec / Zerk (C-K and Z/G are interchangeable). Gerk/Żrec amongst Slavs was a member of a high caste of slavic priests, who were close to the 'gods'. Of course, it is very possible that the Slavs have been living in that region for much longer than the mainstreams historians tell us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually that's my thesis i state!
      Proto-Slavic ppl were Balkan ppl,long time before anything hellenic or Mycean was known...

      Delete
  2. Here is about the Zreks (Greks):

    https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%BDrec

    I had some more information about it, I have to look for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, gonna consider this one.

      Žrec
      Iz Wikipedije, proste enciklopedije
      Žrec je ime za duhovnika-daritvenika v staroslovanski kulturi in je pomensko blizu besede žrtva (daritev). [1] Izraz žrec je povezan etimološko tudi z litovsko besedo giti (hvaliti) in ostalimi baltskimi jeziki in prihaja iz praindoevropske *glr »hvalna pesem« [2][3].

      Žreci so se ukvarjali z polaganjem daritev in določanjem terminov obredov, napovedovanjem usod, verovanjem in sklepanjem zakonov (svatba). Žreci so sestavljali elito v slovanski staroverski družbi in so imeli velik političen vpliv, pogosto so tudi vladali skupaj s knezom. Po starih kronikah so imeli dolge lasje, ki si jih niso strigli. V času kristjanizacije Slovanov so bili glavno jedro upora proti novi religiji. [4] Poleg žrecov so pri Slovanih obstajali tudi volhi, ki so imeli šamanske funkcije in so bili podobni žrecem.

      Delete
  3. I just finished reading your edited post. I didn't realize the truth behind the "greek" history. It's so very sad.
    So, it seems that the modern 'greeks' are anatolian now... 'fake greeks'

    I have a question, do you know the story behind the genetic differences between north and south Slavs? I mean, the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians etc. - most of these Slavs are of genetic haplogroup R1a1. The south Slavs (from the balkans) are of a different haplogroup, I2 - so basically they should be called 'south Scandinavians', not slavs, you understand it, right? So, how come these two totally different genetic groups who inhabit two different regions speak the same language and both are called Slavs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haven't finished this article yet, there is too much to add and too much to write.
      South Slavs are both R1a and I2.
      I2 is of old Brygian race, ancestral race to Helm (Balkan) that is mixed with Scytian R1a.
      At one point in time Brygians went to Herm (Anatolia) and formed families there. It was before big tribulations, around 4000BC with first invading wave of so called Trakhians. Trakhians and Scytian are the same race, white male. Naming is formed differently then most people think, those are not their names but names of those the conquered.
      Brygian race was ginger with most likely brown eyes, acording to prehistoric figurines when they would add colour for eyes and hair which wasn't very often, besides caves are full of red wavy hair, maybe even Neanderthal race. Anyway, Korai in Greece are regularly red haired in all shades and brown eyed. They have been Brygian race because in Anatolia you will find same pattern in both prehistoric and ancient times.
      Haplop I is most probably original European male.
      There is a referance to a "Battle of First and Second Sons" in one of the records of Alexander Macedonian.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Analysis of haplop groups are not really done and as all previous finds it will be probably debunked at some point.
      I do think R1a is Scytian or Slavic patriarchal invador that is described as blond ,blue eyed and tall as Slavic normaly are on areas that haven't been under other invading, women raping conquests in the past.

      Delete
  5. So, I am a little bit confused.
    I talk to my slavic friends (mostly males) and it goes like this: when they talk about the so called 'aryans' and how they were of slavic haplogroup R1a1 they are super happy - this proves that slavs are much more ancient and they had a developed culture and a writing system already 4000 years ago (sanskrit). And they say "Yes, the aryans were definitely Slavs".
    But then I say "Hey, folks, these aryan guys were misogynistic pedophiles, they married 10 years old girls" - and suddenly the aryans are "no longer" slavs, they start to talk how the aryans were 'mixed' and not really slavs. They say that the real slavs were egalitarian women-loving, quasi-matriarchal 'good guys' and they were different from the 'aryan slavs'. But I have doubts.

    For example, in some slavic languages when a man marries a woman we say "He got married" but when a woman gets married we say "She went after her man" or "Her family gave her away". This (To go AFTER her husband) says a lot - Slavs were definitely not matriarchal, because women went AFTER their husbands - this means they had to leave their house, so there was no inheritance for females, the house and the land was given to sons. It's also possible that the so called dowry was practised (and this often leads to female infanticide and the preference to male child over a girl).
    Also, if the females had no rights to possess any land or house this surely led to some kind of abuse - and maybe even incest (raping daughters by the fathers, it's quite common in nuclear families). I am speculating here, because we have little written records but it's normal that the more power the males have the more the females get abused. I am not sure if the slavs were any different here.

    Before, I used to think that the ancient slavs were very much egalitarian and the abusing of females started only when we got christianized. Because of how much we were nature-centered, we had many 'pagan' festivities based on seasons, astronomy etc. But it seems that the slavs (at least in the north) were already patriarchal even before christianization. And, after all, if the slavs weren't so bad, then where all this aryan pedo-misogyny came from? It must have been brought to India by the slavs (R1a1), I see no other option.
    Do you have any thoughts on this?
    My slavic friends say that the slavs were very much like native americans (at least some), nature-centered and respecting women. But there are so many contradictions here.. and it's quite confusing to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nohohohooo Slavic men are patriarchal to the core but they will have to take few notches off of their overblown ego some time soon.
      It is also a woman that allows it and passing this type of submitance to her daughters as well, it is "traditional"...those are deep holes that desperatly need reconsideration because woman will simply refuse to take it any longer. It is happening now, men are complaining about lack of children and at the same time they raise their sons "to be a man" meaning to score, play with girls, use them and leave them... If you hav to raise child alone why would you have a child in the first place? This is happening now and it have been going on for past 50 years.
      Do you remember this gruesome custom "Crnogorski Kum"?
      I didn't published it yet but I will, with long, intensive rant...

      Delete
    2. Sorry but both of you are completely wrong!!!!
      I won't debate if there are some assholes abusing their wife, misunderstanding what it means to be a man!
      Yes, women leave their parents, and guess what, this happens from stoneage till today. And it is how it has to be....not because a women isn't allowed to own lands but because that's how a tribe grows.
      Just imagine, it was the opposite, the village and so the tribe wouldn't expand like it was...
      And nope, if i had a son it would beat the shit out of him if i would ever hear that he doesn't treat his girlfriend or wife right!!!
      I would always teach him to be respectful, responsible, tough but smooth...
      Men are meant to go on crusades against offenders, why? Because men cannot get pregnant so that the heritage was safe.
      Men are the saddest, poor guys....it's us dying in battles to save our beloved families, it is us giving the last will and bequeathed all we have just to know you're fine!
      It's not fair to believe every man is the same stupid fuck like some uneducated individuals!
      My Father teached me to be respectful, be polite and a gentleman of old school...
      Women are Angels living on earth, and we guys have to treat them with patience and a loving heart...
      I would give my soul to know my wife and kids safe!!!!

      Delete
    3. Sorry but both of you are completely wrong!!!!
      I won't debate if there are some assholes abusing their wife, misunderstanding what it means to be a man!
      Yes, women leave their parents, and guess what, this happens from stoneage till today. And it is how it has to be....not because a women isn't allowed to own lands but because that's how a tribe grows.
      Just imagine, it was the opposite, the village and so the tribe wouldn't expand like it was...
      And nope, if i had a son it would beat the shit out of him if i would ever hear that he doesn't treat his girlfriend or wife right!!!
      I would always teach him to be respectful, responsible, tough but smooth...
      Men are meant to go on crusades against offenders, why? Because men cannot get pregnant so that the heritage was safe.
      Men are the saddest, poor guys....it's us dying in battles to save our beloved families, it is us giving the last will and bequeathed all we have just to know you're fine!
      It's not fair to believe every man is the same stupid fuck like some uneducated individuals!
      My Father teached me to be respectful, be polite and a gentleman of old school...
      Women are Angels living on earth, and we guys have to treat them with patience and a loving heart...
      I would give my soul to know my wife and kids safe!!!!

      Delete
    4. Sorry but both of you are completely wrong!!!!
      I won't debate if there are some assholes abusing their wife, misunderstanding what it means to be a man!
      Yes, women leave their parents, and guess what, this happens from stoneage till today. And it is how it has to be....not because a women isn't allowed to own lands but because that's how a tribe grows.
      Just imagine, it was the opposite, the village and so the tribe wouldn't expand like it was...
      And nope, if i had a son it would beat the shit out of him if i would ever hear that he doesn't treat his girlfriend or wife right!!!
      I would always teach him to be respectful, responsible, tough but smooth...
      Men are meant to go on crusades against offenders, why? Because men cannot get pregnant so that the heritage was safe.
      Men are the saddest, poor guys....it's us dying in battles to save our beloved families, it is us giving the last will and bequeathed all we have just to know you're fine!
      It's not fair to believe every man is the same stupid fuck like some uneducated individuals!
      My Father teached me to be respectful, be polite and a gentleman of old school...
      Women are Angels living on earth, and we guys have to treat them with patience and a loving heart...
      I would give my soul to know my wife and kids safe!!!!

      Delete
    5. Sorry but both of you are completely wrong!!!!
      I won't debate if there are some assholes abusing their wife, misunderstanding what it means to be a man!
      Yes, women leave their parents, and guess what, this happens from stoneage till today. And it is how it has to be....not because a women isn't allowed to own lands but because that's how a tribe grows.
      Just imagine, it was the opposite, the village and so the tribe wouldn't expand like it was...
      And nope, if i had a son it would beat the shit out of him if i would ever hear that he doesn't treat his girlfriend or wife right!!!
      I would always teach him to be respectful, responsible, tough but smooth...
      Men are meant to go on crusades against offenders, why? Because men cannot get pregnant so that the heritage was safe.
      Men are the saddest, poor guys....it's us dying in battles to save our beloved families, it is us giving the last will and bequeathed all we have just to know you're fine!
      It's not fair to believe every man is the same stupid fuck like some uneducated individuals!
      My Father teached me to be respectful, be polite and a gentleman of old school...
      Women are Angels living on earth, and we guys have to treat them with patience and a loving heart...
      I would give my soul to know my wife and kids safe!!!!

      Delete

  6. So, this is very sad. I hoped the Slavs were different but they were just sick brutals... it makes me vomit :(
    But I am wondering if they were the only ones? I think there were also other groups who helped to spread the patriarchy. You don't write anything on the Jews? and they are quite important. They are basically everywhere and always in positions of power, the banking system, the corpo-world, the media.. The jewish Talmud also discuss having sex with children.. it prescribes no penalty for raping them, because they are "just" kids anyways...
    I still don't understand how it really developed, and what was the connection between Egypt/bible/vatican and the aryans or Slavs. The aramaic bible (the Targumim) says that jews were not egyptian slaves but egyptian high caste of Yehudah priests... And Roger Sabbath writes it was Ptolemy that forced some 70 hebrew scribes to compile the bible, the OT... and you claim that the Vatican was funded by the Dorians.. I really don't get it because the Ptolemaics and the Dorians were europeans, not Semites.. so I don't understand why they would need a book that tells the story of some semitic tribes and how they were "chosen by god".. It's just completely nonsensical. Do you have any info on this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes I do, liguisticaly, historical, in every sense, it will be a shocker. I am not ready yet to open this can of worms.
      Israelites are not Jews, this much I can tell for now, it will give you a hint on my latest Dark Shade of Red.
      For now I am downloading records on Southers Slavs but it will encompass a whole lotta of Slavic, ancient groupations, division, creations of territories, rulership, church and it's most gruesome role in all of this etc, from this branch the rest of the picture will start forming on it's own.
      As for men, do not worry much about it, there is so much dirt on all of them that they themselves will be shocked and ashamed.

      Delete
    2. Keep an eye on previous posts and new ones, they are all connected evn if it doesn't look that way.

      Delete