Wednesday 27 January 2016

ROYAL HOUSE vs TRIBAL





For very long time most if not all nations and races are struggling to prove or claim (rightfully or not) so called "high civilisations" and acording to this ideas to ascribe themselves bunch of epitets such as  "true kings" "aryans" "the best" "highest" "godly" "pure ones" etc
and to prove that point they all go to show massive structures of the past,
others claim writting systems as sign of "intelligence"
well - WRONG !
in all casses
because if one doesn't understand a TRIBE completely
in a way it has became,
what constitutes tribe as living entity,
hows and whens have no real background to a claim
and all idea just collapse in itself.

When you take a look at prehistory what you will see is following;
Drawings on cave walls of animals and women.
Sometimes with children
and priestesses, lots of them.
Pristesses are mostly Horned "deities".
What is missing on large scale is a male and when he is in the picture
he hunts or is engaged in war.
Villages were huge ,male figure was absent, prevalent figurines are those of mother and child alone, all this regardless of race, in fact male figures are so rare that they question existance of males up to some 4000BC for Europe and aprox 7000BC for Africa.
(i have been generous with numbers in both casses)
Absence of male figure questions "reproductive" ways too that we take for granted.

Prehistoric findings show some extremely brutal attacks and disperse of these massive villages.
This is common to all races and all continents.
Out of cave to a clay house, growing crops and raising children is a matter of a mother.
Often depicting of birthing mother is explaining a forming foundation of a tribe self.
What you see is what you get.
Mother give birth to several children
They give birth to others so basic constitution of a tribe was a family.
Family without a father figure.
So that very begin of any house was a mother and her family.
Mother made a house.
Mother is "the house"
Mother made flesh.
Mother is "the Queen Mother".

This basic rules of any royal house are to be seen all over the Earth.
Regardless of future "development"
(development is questionable thing, just check the trail of garbage)
term Royal House is tight with Tribal.
IT IS TRIBAL.



one of best known royal names is Elizabeth who is carrier of Queen Mother title.

who is eL?
who is God?
how many times El is a Beth?
God is a House?
yes, she is House God.
in a tribes each house had a God.


this is one meaning of Elizabeth out of many in just one name.


Consequent to this waste picture of our early beginnings is a following conclusion.
There wasn't any massive movements of nations at all
what happened was that men moved
men didn't had home
men hunted
men made wars.
And CONQUERED.
And they still do...




Once a house is built and tribe becomes large one need a larger house.
It took millenias to come up with idea to build a "large house".
This large house needed peace, long term of peace to happen and many generations was waiting for that gifted one. Ideas are individual and yes, we are different and some have more gift then others.
So it is infact not a nation but a few special ones.
Those special ones were amongst tribal mothers.
Woman built this world from scrath.

and today we have folloving;

mayority is less gifted
those with ego problems are less gifted,
not all less gifted are ego-maniacs,
some less gifted are joy
Inventions are distructions.
(atom bomb is "invention"...seriously? O.o)

18 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is not that straight-forward but as consequence of chain of events Absolutely yes, Dorians had major influence in creating of church institution as we know it today.
      To go in depth I have to untangle all ancient civilisations, translate much more then i did so far and I don't post here cause I'm working on it.
      Good news is that I found out that during "Byzant" (orthodox christianity) Mother was still a God, not Jesus.

      Delete
    2. Also story from Torah about "god" creation of 72 languages out of one is actualy story about Ptolemai, he did just that. It went in stages.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes, off course, Akkadian language supressed Sumerian and Akkadian was so called "lingua franca" while Sumerian was natural language. It happens when rulers set the laws, they change language and in case of "crime" they call on what is written, we live that today.
      hahaha, you are correct about "aryans", i loathe them completely and this is the reason i didn't wrote a thing on aryan issue. What I found so far was disgusting.
      Sanskrit is over 65% Slavic and I have to make a mage with my own findings, actualy entire Rig Veda would look different translated in Slavic. I know the base, the how, the who, when it ended up in India and China.
      What you odn't know is that white people inhabitted almost entire Asia, it is well described by all ancient writers and these people spoke slavic-related tongues like Tocharian for example, a daughter is kcerka for example..i have massive archives, just have to decide if I am going to publish it.
      I speak five languages and study all others, living and dead! :D
      I also have firm belief that once upon a time we all spoke one language, most of languages are anagrams plus application of Kabalah and Grimms laws they all come down to the same. I found other letter-keys switches and systems but that is still work in progress, now it is on pauze. :)

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete


    4. Thanks you again for help!
      I know about Tartaria, it was Scythian and Russians just started coming out of their closet, there are such fascinating records that have been kept away with cold wars and sanctions not to blow all covers off this fake His-Story.

      Name of Russia to this day is Venäjä in Finlandish language. (Vendi, Veneti)
      Those names are very important, they reveal TRUE like nothing else.

      I am making lots of typos today, much deleting and correcting..

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. Etruscans real name is Raseni, Egyptians were of the race Reth, not to mention all this Slavic states under name of Raethi, Rassi, Ko-Rushka, H-Rvat-ska, Serbian Rashka, Germani was under that name ,same as Austria and Swiss...also they have R1a which is Slavic normaly.
      Scandinavians are Slavs by their history, linguistics, their own language and old Norse Edas, actualy those Edas are very correct, they describe Trachian period to the tooth.

      Delete
    7. Do you have any picture of Wańka-Wstańka maybe?

      Delete
    8. found it, thanks, very interesting name...

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    10. This is the best thing you wrote so far! With your permission I will add this to the article "dark shade of red" with your name of choice, best if it is your full name because this is just brilliant and it shouldn't be attributed to anyone else. You have some serious talent and enough discipline to detangle just about anything.

      Delete
    11. "Greeks" were Axayans or Askayans or Scythians (blond-blue eyes mostly,tall) which are today so mixed with the redhaired race that it is impossible to draw a line in between. This line might be drawn only between MtDna and Y chr Dna. Female line will be redhaired for most.

      Delete
    12. about separated blonds and reds yes I know, had no time to add it yet to above article and who knows what else sit in my archives that I forgot by now.

      Delete
    13. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    14. Thank you! I will use it and you are very talented for this kind of work, really rare talent.

      Delete